A 24-year-old male patient was admitted due to "dry mouth, polydipsia, polyuria, and weight loss for 10 days".
Ten days ago, the patient developed dry mouth without obvious inducement, with daily water intake increasing from 1000mL to 3000-3500mL. He also presented with polyuria, increased nocturia, weight loss of approximately 4kg, fatigue, lassitude, and foamy urine. No polyphagia, easy hunger, chest tightness, shortness of breath, blurred vision, nausea, vomiting, or other symptoms were noted. Physical examination at the hospital's Health Check-up Center showed "fasting blood glucose 20.85 mmol/L, glycated hemoglobin 14.5%", and "diabetes mellitus" was considered. The patient was then admitted to our department for further treatment.
Blood Pressure (BP): 145/89 mmHg; other vital signs were stable. Body Mass Index (BMI): 32.9 kg/m². No obvious abnormalities were found in the heart, lungs, or abdomen.
Urinalysis: Glucose 2+, Ketone Bodies 4+, Protein 2+; Liver Function: ALT 388 U/L, AST 86 U/L, γGGT 226 U/L, ALP 126 U/L; Renal Function: Uric Acid 588 μmol/L; Blood Lipids: Total Cholesterol 5.65 mmol/L, Triglycerides 4.49 mmol/L, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) 3.13 mmol/L; Blood Gas Analysis, Diabetes Autoantibodies, Electrocardiogram, and Chest X-ray showed no obvious abnormalities; Abdominal and Urinary System Color Doppler Ultrasound: Hepatomegaly, Fatty Liver. Random capillary blood glucose after admission: Hi(excessively high).
1. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Type 2 Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy; 2. Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis; 3. Obesity; 4. Metabolic Syndrome.
Treatment Regimen Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)
After admission, the patient presented severe hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis. CGM was applied, and insulin pump therapy was initiated for glucose-lowering, rehydration and ketoacidosis correction.
| Time | Hypoglycemic Regimen | Blood Glucose Profile | Average Blood Glucose (mmol/L) | Time in Range (%) (TIR) | Time Above Range (%) (TAR) | Time Below Range (%) (TBR) |
| February 14 | Insulin microinfusion pump | 17.7 | 0.00% | 100% | 0.00% | |
| February 15 | Subcutaneous insulin pump (basal rate 22.8U, 8U before three meals) | 17.0 | 0.00% | 100% | 0.00% | |
| February 16 | Insulin pump (basal rate 30U, 11U before three meals) + Liraglutide 0.6mg qn | 17.3 | 0.00% | 100% | 0.00% | |
| February 17 | Insulin pump (basal rate 34.8U, 14U before three meals) + Liraglutide 0.6mg qn | 17.1 | 0.00% | 100% | 0.00% |
Note: TIR: Time when blood glucose is within the target range (3.9~10.0 mmol/L); TAR: Time when blood glucose is above the target range (>10.0 mmol/L); TBR: Time when blood glucose is below the target range (<3.9 mmol/L)
Through CGM, it was observed that the patient's TIR was 0% for several consecutive days, indicating poor blood glucose control. Considering the severe insulin resistance, drugs not affecting liver function such as Liraglutide and Miglitol were successively added. After confirming no obvious gastrointestinal reactions in the patient, the doses of the drugs were gradually increased to reduce insulin resistance.
| Time | Hypoglycemic Regimen | Blood Glucose Profile | Average Blood Glucose (mmol/L) | Time in Range (%) (TIR) | Time Above Range (%) (TAR) | Time Below Range (%) (TBR) |
| February 18 | Insulin pump (basal rate 39.6U, 14U before three meals) + Liraglutide 0.6mg qn + Miglitol 50mg tid | 16.4 | 0.00% | 100% | 0.00% | |
| February 19 | Insulin pump (basal rate 43.8U, 14U before three meals) + Liraglutide 0.6mg qn + Miglitol 50mg tid | 13.8 | 0.00% | 100% | 0.00% | |
| February 20 | Insulin pump (basal rate 47U, 16U before three meals) + Liraglutide 1.2mg qn + Miglitol 50mg tid | 12.7 | 10.00% | 90.00% | 0.00% | |
| February 21 | Insulin pump (basal rate 47U, 16U before three meals) + Liraglutide 1.2mg qn + Miglitol 50mg tid | 10.9 | 31.50% | 68.50% | 0.00% | |
| February 22 | Insulin pump (basal rate 47U, 16U before three meals) + Liraglutide 1.2mg qn + Miglitol 100mg tid | 12.0 | 38.5% | 61.50% | 0.00% | |
| February 23 | Insulin pump (basal rate 47U, 16U before three meals) + Liraglutide 1.2mg qn + Miglitol 100mg tid | 6.1 | 91.30% | 8.50% | 0.20% |
Note: TIR: Time when blood glucose is within the target range (3.9~10.0 mmol/L); TAR: Time when blood glucose is above the target range (>10.0 mmol/L); TBR: Time when blood glucose is below the target range (<3.9 mmol/L)
Hepatitis markers were negative, supporting the diagnosis of "non-alcoholic steatohepatitis". After drug treatment, the rechecked liver function gradually improved. Through CGM, it was observed that the patient's blood glucose gradually improved but still did not meet the target. Since the patient had no gastrointestinal reactions, the dose of "Liraglutide" was increased to 1.2mg qn, and "Metformin Hydrochloride Tablets 0.85g qd" was combined to reduce insulin resistance.
| Time | Hypoglycemic Regimen | Blood Glucose Profile | Average Blood Glucose (mmol/L) | Time in Range (%) (TIR) | Time Above Range (%) (TAR) | Time Below Range (%) (TBR) |
| February 24 | Insulin pump (basal rate 42.2U, 16U before three meals) + Liraglutide 1.2mg qn + Miglitol 100mg tid + Metformin 0.85g qd | 6.2 | 97.10% | 2.50% | 0.40% | |
| February 25 | Insulin pump (basal rate 39.8U, 14U before three meals) + Liraglutide 1.2mg qn + Miglitol 100mg tid + Metformin 0.85g qd | 6.4 | 96.00% | 4.00% | 0.00% |
Note: TIR: Time when blood glucose is within the target range (3.9~10.0 mmol/L); TAR: Time when blood glucose is above the target range (>10.0 mmol/L); TBR: Time when blood glucose is below the target range (<3.9 mmol/L)
After observing that the patient's blood glucose reached the target through CGM, the insulin pump was withdrawn. The patient was switched to twice-daily premixed insulin injection combined with hypoglycemic drugs such as "Liraglutide, Miglitol, and Metformin". The patient's blood glucose met the target, with daily TIR fluctuating between 95.6% and 100%, and blood glucose control was good, so discharge was arranged.
| Time | Hypoglycemic Regimen | Blood Glucose Profile | Average Blood Glucose (mmol/L) | Time in Range (%) (TIR) | Time Above Range (%) (TAR) | Time Below Range (%) (TBR) |
| February 26 | Insulin Aspart 30 Injection, 30U in the morning, 30U in the evening + Metformin 0.85g qd + Miglitol 100mg tid + Liraglutide 1.2mg qn | 6.4 | 95.60% | 4.40% | 0.00% | |
| February 27 | Insulin Aspart 30 Injection, 30U in the morning, 30U in the evening + Metformin 0.85g qd + Miglitol 100mg tid + Liraglutide 1.2mg qn | 6.3 | 98.30% | 1.70% | 0.00% | |
| February 28(Discharge) | Insulin Aspart 30 Injection, 30U in the morning, 28U in the evening + Metformin 0.85g bid + Miglitol 100mg tid + Liraglutide 1.2mg qn | 6.5 | 100% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
| March 1 | Insulin Aspart 30 Injection, 30U in the morning, 28U in the evening + Metformin 0.85g bid + Miglitol 100mg tid + Liraglutide 1.2mg qn | 6.2 | 99.6% | 0.4% | 0.0% |
Note: TIR: Time when blood glucose is within the target range (3.9~10.0 mmol/L); TAR: Time when blood glucose is above the target range (>10.0 mmol/L); TBR: Time when blood glucose is below the target range (<3.9 mmol/L)
After admission, the patient's lifestyle related to diet and exercise was evaluated, and it was found that he had long-term bad eating habits, including long-term and frequent intake of high-sugar, high-GI foods (such as white rice, pasta, sugary drinks, etc.) and refined processed foods. These bad eating habits aggravated insulin resistance and led to large fluctuations in blood glucose.
During CGM monitoring, personalized dietary guidance was provided to the patient based on the food GI value table; at the same time, using the real-time impact of different foods on blood glucose fluctuations displayed by CGM, the patient was helped to intuitively understand the difference in blood glucose impact between low-GI foods (such as whole wheat bread, vegetables, and low-sugar fruits) and high-GI foods (such as white rice and sugary drinks). Through monitoring, the patient found that high-GI foods caused a rapid rise in blood glucose, with obvious blood glucose spikes in CGM data, while the intake of low-GI foods made blood glucose more stable and avoided sharp fluctuations.
Through these data feedback, the patient was motivated to correct bad eating habits, began to strictly follow the low-GI diet principle, gradually reduced the intake of high-sugar foods, and significantly improved postprandial blood glucose fluctuations.
The patient was followed up regularly after discharge. With the relief of hyperglycemic toxicity, the patient's islet function gradually recovered. Insulin was gradually reduced to withdrawal, the doses of oral hypoglycemic drugs and "Liraglutide" remained unchanged, and the patient insisted on following the low-GI diet.
Three weeks after discharge, the patient rechecked liver function at the outpatient clinic of our department, which was normal. Considering that the hyperglycemic toxic effect was gradually relieved and islet function was gradually recovered, while the patient was obese, long-term use of insulin was not conducive to weight loss. Therefore, the hypoglycemic regimen was adjusted to: Liraglutide Injection 1.8mg qn + Metformin Hydrochloride Tablets 0.85g bid + Miglitol Tablets 50mg tid. The patient felt that capillary blood glucose monitoring was troublesome and requested CGM again. During CGM, the patient's blood glucose was well controlled, with TAR 0.00% and TIR 100%.
| Time | Hypoglycemic Regimen | Blood Glucose Profile | Average Blood Glucose (mmol/L) | Time in Range (%) (TIR) | Time Above Range (%) (TAR) | Time Below Range (%) (TBR) |
| March 22 | Metformin 0.85g bid + Miglitol 50mg tid + Liraglutide 1.8mg qn | 6.1 | 100% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
| March 23 | Metformin 0.85g bid + Miglitol 50mg tid + Liraglutide 1.8mg qn | 5.7 | 100% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
| March 24 | Metformin 0.85g bid + Miglitol 50mg tid + Liraglutide 1.8mg qn | 5.6 | 100% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Note: TIR: Time when blood glucose is within the target range (3.9~10.0 mmol/L); TAR: Time when blood glucose is above the target range (>10.0 mmol/L); TBR: Time when blood glucose is below the target range (<3.9 mmol/L)
In this case, CGM was used to accurately guide treatment and lifestyle intervention, achieving comprehensive benefits including rapid blood glucose control, insulin reduction and withdrawal, weight management, and liver function recovery. Rational use of GLP-1 receptor agonists, α-glucosidase inhibitors, and Metformin avoided excessive dependence on insulin, while taking into account hypoglycemia and metabolic improvement, ultimately successfully achieving the goal of personalized treatment. In addition, by intuitively presenting the real-time impact of different foods on blood glucose fluctuations, the patient's understanding of diabetic diet was deepened, helping the patient restore a healthy lifestyle.